Essay --

A person that avoids any animal products, as in any meats or animal-derived foods is considered a vegetarian. This is the general classification of a vegetarian. It is a challenge to classify a vegetarian; many variations were created to suit certain diets. Lactovegetarians are vegetarians that consume milk and dairy products. Ovo-vegetarians eat eggs but no dairy products, and some do consume honey. Lacto-ovo-vegetarians exclude meats and seafood’s but consume dairy products and eggs. The lacto-ovo-vegetarian eating pattern also consists of legumes, seeds and nuts. Vegans are the only pure vegetarians; they exclude all animal derived foods. There are also people that classify themselves as near vegetarians, for example macrobiotic diets. The macrobiotic diet consists mostly grains, legumes and vegetables and limited amounts of fish. There is also an instance where people will adopt being a vegetarian occasionally; this is called being a flexitarian. Appropriately planned vegetarian diets can be essential to any one, in any stage of their life. Vegetarian diets are associated with lower risks of cancer, death from ischemic heart disease or any cardiovascular disease. Also lower body mass index (BMI), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, low blood pressure and lower rates of hypertension than those of which are non-vegetarians. Kidney and liver conditions can tell a person whether or not adopting a vegetarian diet can be helpful for their conditions. Those that exhibit lower levels of protein, phosphorus, sodium, manganese, and have an abundant amount of zinc and potassium are better suited to diets that focuses on meats, those that show signs of the opposite levels, are better suited to adopt vegetarianism. However it ... ...results in longer lives. There are many factors to why some want be vegetarians. Many believe that it is more ethical to become vegetarian. That warm-blooded animals being slaughtered have emotions and connections and are sacrificed to satisfy the decedent meat eating lifestyle. Or let it be that we are supporting many genetically modified crops and feeding them to the animals we eat; only supporting an artificial lifecycle. Many vegetarians are born into the lifestyle; most people from India are vegetarians because of the animals they worship. It is called the Asian –Indian diets, which is predominantly lacto-vegetarian. Many choose the lifestyle because of health concerns and concerns of the environment; that we are a product of our environment. What ever we take from the world or put into it is the reason there are so many health problems, like a circle of life.

I Miss your Beauty and Vibes Essay

â€Å"A Mixed Tex-Cal marriage,† an article written by the author Jose Burciaga, Texan, tells us about his new life after getting married to a Californian woman, Cecilia. At first, the author tells that he thought that he and his wife have common ideas and beliefs because they were both Chicanos. Then, he shows that he was surprised when he noticed the different customs and ideas he and his wife have because they were from different grounds. They lived for a couple of years in Washington, DC and Alexandra, Virginia, then, they settled in California near the beaches and the soft weather. The writer argues that Texas Chicanos are more attached with their traditions than Californian Chicanos who show more Americanization. After some years, he grew to like California food and drink, but still missed the weather and the smell of Texas. From Burciaga s’ article, I can understand what he went through to get used to Californian traditions. Like him, I also miss my native land. Despite the beauty and extra opportunities in Chicago, my heart still aches for Oran. Oran is a wonderful city located in the northwest of Algeria, known for its beautiful beaches and food. Chicago to me is one of the most beautiful cities in the world, with its beautiful tall buildings, green spices. However, Burciaga was satisfied with the weather of California, like he says,† I am totally spoiled and laid-back in Northern Califias†, In contrast it was hard for me in getting used to the cold weather of Chicago. In fact, the difference between Oran and Chicago is evident in weather, beauty, movement and food. First, the weather of Oran is often beautiful and mild. In autumn, when we are on our way to school, the wind blows softly and rapidly as if its spirit is pushing me to be on time. When going back home at 12 pm for lunch the weather is warm, the sun sparkles, the birds sing, we’d think spring has already come. However, most of the autumn nights were horrible because the wind blew strongly; it sounds like bad spirits are trying to unlock the windows. By the winter the rain fell mostly at night, the buildings seem freshly washed and the roads are already dried in the mornings but the weather is cold. Stepping to March, the gardens and forests become green and full of flowers. Once May is over, the summer is already there. The weather is warm but not stifling and the sea at the beaches is sparkling and full of life with many swimmers. This is in contrast to Chicago where the weather is often unacceptable. In the winter, when I am outside, I am afraid that I will lose feeling in my legs when the freezing sensation emerges from the soft snow. Autumn in Chicago is a lovely, pale, orange view with the golden leaves covering the streets. It is disappointing when most of springy days are cloudy and rainy. Fortunately, we can see the mild warm weather during summer in Chicago. Second, Oran is a small, pretty city full of life. From a distance you can see the long green balcony along the city center next to the short pretty buildings engraved from top to bottom. Going through the city center, cafes are already full and active at 9 am and the roads are busy with the noisy cars. I lived in Bir El Djir, a quiet neighborhood 28 Km far from the city center. Bir El Dgir is a luxury neighborhood full of villas. From the window of our kitchen, I could see our beautiful garden and our neighbors’ gardens too, I could also overhear their conversations and shouting. I felt always happy and full of life in this lively environment. It is quite different in Chicago, a big wonderful city with more stillness. Downtown Chicago is a wide stretch of tall buildings, we notice any clutter or cracks in the roads, every building and road is shiny and neat, the luxurious clothes and furniture are apparent from the stores’ wide show cases. Tourists hang their shopping bags; they seem fascinated by the beauty of Chicago. Third,Oran is a city of Haute Cuisine. Along all the big avenues of Oran, the savory sweet smell of pastry travels from the bakeries. Approaching a bakery, our eyes are stunned with the colorful cookies. In front of the showcase, we can’t choose between the attractive pieces of pastry. I remember one of the soft chocolate pastries I once picked, covered with frothy cream; as much as I describe it can tell how it really tastes. Unlike Chicago, the land of immigration, where restaurants offer many food traditions. For example, I have been once in Us’mania , an Indian restaurant, where I tasted Biryani, a tasty spicy rice with chicken. Also, we go often to Pita Inn, a Lebanese restaurant where we like to order Shawarma, a thin long piece of grilled chicken, salad and tomato twisted in a thin bred. I am glad to discover many foreign traditions; I feel that I have visited many countries. In conclusion, Chicago is very cold in the winter, but I appreciate the magical time of snow falling. When skating in the ice rink, I feel like flying in the air. Downtown Chicago, is a magnificent place that i dream to visit every day; however, I always think about the lively activity of Oran and miss the savory pizza and dishes.

What is life cycle management and how it impacts us - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 18 Words: 5319 Downloads: 10 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Management Essay Type Narrative essay Did you like this example? Why life-cycle management? A convenient way of understanding the issues that underlie life-cycle thinking is through the notion of our footprint on the planet. Some footprints such as carbon, water, and energy can be quantified. Other more ecological footprints resist calculation although they remain a useful general concept in discussion. A footprint is taken to be the total effect of all the steps in the life-chain of products and materials we consume (Wikipedia, 2009). A more holistic management of these accumulated impacts is a prerequisite for achieving a sustainable lifestyle that is within the resource capacity of our planet. For a better understanding of issues that underlie life-cycle is through the notion of footprint on the planet. Some of them include carbon, water, and energy which can be quantified. A footprint is taken to be total effect of all the steps in the life- chain of products and materials we consume. A more holistic management of these impacts is a prerequisite for achieving a sus tainable lifestyle which is within the resource capacity of our planet. Most of the environmental impact we see today is due to the surprisingly low resource efficiency of our modern society. Overall, only about 6 per cent of total resource consumption goes into the final manufactured product. The other 94 per cent is discarded as (unwanted) by-product at various places along the production-consumption cycle (Senge et al. 2002). Wasteful technologies and throwaway products are often highlighted as the principal problems. However, the root cause of inefficiencies is also the uncoordinated nature of the value chains. Optimization of individual steps does not necessarily lead to a reduction of the biggest impact, nor does it result in an optimization of the system as a whole. In many cases, impacts are simply pushed along the life-chain, rather than being mitigated in any real way. A simple example below illustrates this problem in a practical way: Leather tanners who purchased r aw hides from foreign sources for processing regularly found themselves out of regulatory compliance with respect to pesticide levels in their wastewater. Pesticides are added by cattle farmers and slaughterhouses to protect the freshly skinned hides from bacterial and insect attack. The embedded chemicals pass along the entire value-chain in the leather industry and some end up in wastewater wherever a washing stage occurs. There was no intra-sector communication and negotiation framework to solve this problem, as each link in the value-chain acted independently. Ultimately the added cost of sophisticated wastewater treatment at the tanning stage exceeded the value of the product, and contributed to the decline of the industry in the UK. The problem could have been solved if life-cycle management systems had been in place. An industry-wide initiative relating to chemical use throughout the product cycle could have been negotiated. Individual tanners could have spent more time manag ing their supply-chain. Government regulation could have addressed the root causes, i.e. slaughterhouse practice, rather than applying wastewater standards at the tanning end-point. Lack of appreciation of the life-cycle management concept and the absence of a life-chain partnership meant that none of the above were applied at the time. This type of burden shifting situation is common in many industries. To better understand the structure of the possible solutions, we need to briefly look at the foundations of LCM and the principles on which they are based. Most of the environmental impact seen is because of low resource efficiency of the society. Wasteful technologies and throwaway products are often the problems. However the main problem is also due to lack of coordination in the value chains. Optimization of individuala steps always do not lead to reduction of the impacts, as it just pushes it along the life chain rather than mitigating it. Life-cycle management framewor k and concepts The various definitions of life-cycle management often reflect the particular viewpoints of different stakeholders. According to UNEP life-cycle management (LCM) is a product management system aiming to minimize environmental and socioeconomic burdens . . . during the entire life-cycle . . . [relying on] . . . collaboration and communication with all stakeholders in the value chain. This simple notion belies the difficulties in its implementation. Figure 1 from the food sector gives an indication of the challenge involved. It clearly shows the complex materials that flow in our food supply and where various types of environmental impact occur. LCM works with partners at all these points to effectuate both local and system-level improvements. LCM is not yet a standardized discipline, but rather it is an umbrella framework for combining and applying other management instruments in a more holistic life-chain perspective. The advantage of LCM is its ability to more explicitly take into account upstream and downstream impacts, including situations in which they are widely distributed geographically and socially. It can more easily address global issues and system dynamics than instruments designed for individual company use. A particular feature of LCM is the democratization of the management exercise through the involvement of different value-chain partners. For the present discussion, we group LCM approaches into three broad categories based on their owners. We will elaborate further on these in section 4: Organization of a holistic form of sustainability management within individual companies using, for example, supply-chain management and product design (Five Winds International, 2009). Government life-cycle policies and regulations to address system dysfunctions or to deal with certain product issues such as chemical contamination. Multi-stakeholder voluntary codes to manage sustainability issues for selected commodity ma terials and products, e.g. the Cyanide Code described in the following. In practice, there is a good deal of synergy in these approaches, and they are best used in combination, as, for example, when government regulation enables or supports industry codes or multi-stakeholder mechanisms. As few tools have been developed specifically for implementing LCM, the partners are currently obliged to draw on the existing set of corporate management instruments and government regulations to see what combination of these can be effectively applied along the entire life-chain. The more common ones (see Table I) include supply-chain management (SCM), corporate social responsibility (CSR), environmental design (DFE), and product-service systems (PSS). Some organizations have packaged the most useful instruments into a toolbox (Maplecroft, 2009). As a general comment, many of the current instruments also need to evolve further if they are to play a full part in LCM. The expanded range of objectives in a full sustainable development agenda, and the need to consider the entire value-chain stretches many of them to their limit. For example, while the Global e-Sustainability Initiative (GESI) has developed an electronic tool for sustainability evaluation of electronics suppliers (E-TASC, 2009). This tool considers only a part of the life-chain, often ignoring the impacts of mining the metals that the industry uses. Another example is LCA itself, which is mainly used to assess numerical parameters such as materials and energy flows, whereas the full sustainability agenda includes many non-quantifiable issues such as biodiversity and social aspects. Partnerships are at the core of LCM. There is no single procedure for identifying partners, and indeed some such as the end-consumer are frequently left out. There is still a reluctance to expand the LCM partnerships too far up and down the life-chain, partly out of fear of losing control and partly to keep the management exer cise simple. As a counter example, Figure 2 shows ALCANs vision on products in a company context. Not all corporations are yet interested in including end-consumers in their work on LCM. We can usefully illustrate the above analysis through a case study from the mining industry. This is an example of multi-stakeholder LCM, i.e. item (iii) in the preceding grouping, but the conclusions also have a more general validity: The gold mining industry uses sodium cyanide to leach gold out of crushed mineral ore. Its toxicity means that careful handling is required at all stages of its life chain. Government safety regulations spell out the standards to be followed. After the widely reported spill of 70 tons of cyanide from a mining operation into the Danube River system in 2000, the industry funded an international multi-stakeholder steering group to develop a new (life-cycle) instrument the International Code for Cyanide Management and a membership-based mechanism for its implementati on (ICMI, 2008). The code defines a formal relationship for the key LCM partners: the chemical supplier, the transporter, and the mining company. It thus constitutes a cradle to grave management process. The code incorporates safety objectives, technical standards, and operational procedures to be applied by the LCM partners. Supply-chain management ensures these standards are applied right up to the original chemical manufacturer. Independent audits and a requirement for public consultation ensure that the entire life cycle remains visible to the community. Many private mining investment decisions and government approvals now require companies to be members of this code. Companies on their side have found that the procedures of the code also make their operations more cost-effective. More than 50 per cent of world gold production now takes place by companies that are members of the code. Safety incidents have markedly decreased. But the code also has limitations. In particula r its character as a voluntary agreement means it suffers from the free-rider problem (remedied in part by the tendency of some governments to require adherence to the code as a condition of approval). There is also a problem in application to small operators who have less influence over their supply-chains. Similar experiences have been observed in natural resources, chemicals and minerals, and other sectors. LCM, when systematically applied, can be a major factor in achieving the goals of sustainable development while keeping the company competitive. Its effectiveness increases when there is a synergy between business procedures, e.g. financing, and government approvals, and is at its best when public interest groups also contribute to the arrangements. However, close management control is needed to ensure meaningful objectives to the exercise and to provide effective operational supervision. How is LCM applied now? LCM in business Firstly to make extensive use of LCM was the business sector. They used it as a way to shape its response to market competition, consumer pressure, product quality assurance, workplace and consumer safety, meeting sustainability targets etc. fig.3 shows how companies have seen the usefulness of LCM in a corporate framework. LCM is being promoted as a way of improving companies CSR programs; ex improving their products sustainability performance by the World Business Council for Sustainable Development. Below are given two examples of LCM companies, which emphases on product design and supply chain management respectively: As per Nokia, life cycle covers al major impacts in the life cycle of a product and thus includes the basis for all environmental activities at Nokia along with a framework for actions. Based on this. Targets are set for further improvement of environmental performance. For Nokias two primary product types i.e. the mobile phones and network equipment the life cycle profiles are different. For ne twork equipment the energy consumed during use phase and for mobiles the extraction of raw materials and productions of components have huge environmental impacts (fig.4). This perspective has led to a reduction in the material consumption for phones and today many weighing below 100gm. IKEA tries to produce home furnishing products which are low cost, little influence on environment and produced in a socially responsible way. They have developed a code of conduct that represents minimum demand to its 1600 suppliers in terms of social, environmental and work related conditions. Life cycle thinning has ensured that company is abreast of development trends and also contributes to ensure a sustainable development for IKEA itself and its suppliers. SCM factors include resource use. Sustainable forestry practices and training for employees. It is thus seen from examples that there are different options for LCM depending on the objectives of the companies. Nokia markets its products with lower embedded pollution impacts. But failed to mention social impacts ex: the mining of metals on which electronic circuitry depends, and which has actually led the industry participating in the Gesi initiative. Nokia thus is addressing selectively value chain of its products. IKEA as a distributor exercises better control over its numerous suppliers, including social impact and bio diversity criteria and waste but however it would become difficult for them in influencing suppliers of suppliers. Both examples thus illustrates major challenges facing LCM; i.e. identifying a way the length of chain necessary to resolve sustainability issues in life cycle of products and materials. Other companies which have a life chain approach towards environmental management programs include Alcan, Siemens, Ford, Magna International and Veolia. LC assessment underpins many of these management exercises. Improvements of sustainability performance are led by information of materials and energy flows also by reducing waste, pollution and redesigning products. Now also major distribution chains are focusing on CSR, usage of LCA is also increasing. For ex: In the future shopper at Wal-Mart can also expect to know about the carbon and water footprints and pollution generated during that products manufacture. Its their aim to create a comprehensive indexing system which will provide to its customers the world behind their product. Among its huge suppliers Unilever and PG are supporting this. Its rivals are also being asked to join so as to avoid proliferation of separate indexing systems. This initiative will also have a great impact on supply chain. Manufacturers and suppliers will have to make sustainability major criteria in their operations. Though LCM users were individual companies, now business associations are catching up. The International Council on Metals and Mining (ICMM) statement on materials stewardship is an example of life chain management advocac y for an entire industry sector. It promotes an integrated life cycle approach for production and use of minerals in ensuring alignment with sustainable development fundamentals. Value chain partners are encouraged to take up responsible design, use, re-use, recycling and disposal of materials. Other sector includes the chemicals industry with its Global Products Strategy that is dedicated to improving the responsible handling of chemicals throughout the value-chain. Still there are many challenges for business. Its seen that value chains are being managed are still quite short, and the sustainability objectives are reduced. Stakeholders, mainly end-customers are locked out of the LCM exercise. Smaller companies have insufficient leverage in to manage their supply chain or to redesign its products. And coordination, monitoring, checking actions of the upstream and downstream partners is a major exercise. There is lack of standardization of LCM which leads to diversity of inconsis tent approaches. LCM initiatives of companies also depend upon the government regulatory where sustainability targets are set, information is demanded and procedures are mandated. Even in the political level there are challenges. Instead of achieving real sustainability improvements companies manage LCM process in their own way. This leads to the need of international standardization and or governmental regulation. Many a times governments in the emerging companies become suspicious of western corporate attempts in controlling their supply chains and try using international forums like WTO for blocking such practices. LCM in government Regulators realized that approach to managing environmental quality needs to be in a more comprehensive life-cycle approach. It indeed is difficult due to complex, interconnected web of government regulation in most countries, which mostly is based on single media legislation. Still many of the environmental ministries are trying out a proact ive strategic instrument and policy based life cycle approaches; and some regional and national authorities are putting in holistic legislation which fits into broad area of sustainable consumption and production (SCP) policies. Leadership has come especially from intergovernmental bodies like the European Union (EU), which has taken a visible stance on upstream approaches through, for example, its Integrated Product Policy. Integrated action can be general or applied to a specific class of materials or products. The REACH process in the European Union for potentially hazardous chemicals is a relevant recent example. Another good example of life-cycle legislation is the Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directive 2002/95/EC, commonly referred to as the (RoHS). This limited the usage of 6 hazardous materials like lead, mercury or cadmium in the manufacturing of electrical equipment. It is closely linked to the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive (WEEE) 2002/96 /EC, which sets collection, recycling and recovery targets for electrical goods and is part of a legislative initiative to solve the problem of toxic electronic waste. RoHS has both upstream and downstream components to help reduce health and environmental impacts in developing countries where much of todays high-tech trash ends up for recycling. Even though individually governments have tried in incorporating LCM elements into sustainable development policies, they have experienced many difficulties in giving them effect through regulations. Thus the French parliament in 2008 refused the ministers proposal in introducing differential pricing based on accumulated environmental impact. There is also inherent difficulty in creating legislative lings along extended supply chains as many are international trade process which goes beyond national jurisdiction and only amendable to regional or global initiatives. Sometimes governments do practice a form of LCM directly in a piecemen t fashion. Specific high profile substances like radio active materials, pharmaceuticals, and genetic material can be controlled through a set of independent but interlocking regulations along the life chain, often being under coordination bodies on which interested govt. departments may be represented. Road safety is another issue often subject to a systems approach where vehicles, road infrastructure, user permits, driver behavior, alcohol sales, medical services, etc. are all incorporated into a type of life-chain process where each component is optimized in relation to the others. This has worked in some countries in reducing the road toll, demonstrating that effectively managed holistic approaches can deliver good results in addressing complex problems. Due to the political and logistic challenges, national governments have chosen coordination over integrated regulation. Because of the constraints of LCM emphasis is given on assessment stage (i.e. LCA), promoting research an d data collection and then aligning it with product legislation. Thus it focuses on the consumption end of the value chain rather than production cycle. Other options which are also available with governments are softer form of actions which include product labeling, product awards, and consumer information have increased consciousness of the world behind the product, and thereby provoked more fundamental product rethinking by manufacturers. For example, the EU Energy Label for most white goods, light bulbs, packaging, and cars have been particularly effective in improving the energy efficiency of key products. Major opportunities are being missed which includes government being societys biggest consumer of goods and service. Incorporation of life chain performance criteria in public purchasing and tendering would make suppliers use LCM and realize its commercial advantages. Still, political and cost factors dominate most government supply contracts. Apart from the political c onstraints, constraint at governments part is that role in LCM is constrained because of lack of positioning at a definable point along the value chain. The chief role being to provide and enabling framework that obliges various life-chain partners in adopting LCM. Cooperative life-chain management In some situations, as with many products no company singly dominates the value chain, nor is possible for governments to legislate due to the nature of global market place. In such case, a different model of LCM can be introduced, one of a formal management structure and agreed performance codes. Rather than LCM implementation on a single company initiative (as that of Wal-Mart example) this approach relies on a multi stake holder coalition for taking the process forward. Along with direct supply-chain partners, others who could also be included in these coalitions are civil society groups, intergovernmental organizations and consumer groups. Prominent examples include from the natural resources area, mining, forestry and fisheries where consumer and NGO activity have focused their attention to upstream and downstream issues along with impact of direct operations. Unlike corporate LCM, there is a formal life-cycle management framework which brings all stakeholders in formulating sustainability objectives. Elaboration on performance standards, introduction of monitoring and verification processes and engaging in open communication with end users for quality assurance purposes are carried out by them as a group. Among the best-known examples of LCM partnerships for sustainable resource exploitation are the Forest Stewardship Council and the Marine Stewardship Council: The production and supply of sustainably harvested timber embraces life-cycle management through the certification process put in place by an international instance, the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). The multi-stakeholder FSC was created after UNCED in 1992, when it became clear that only a collective management agreement would reduce the confliction situation concerning timber harvesting. Under the instrument, both forest operations and the timber product are subject to strict conditions with regards to independent auditing and certification, including public reporting. The sustainably produced timber is marketed as such by retailers who have targeted a major consumer segment interested in such products. Some forest product companies claim similar sustainable practices outside such formal agreements, however, little independent auditing usually takes place. As evidence of the effectiveness of the FSC instrument, the WWF reports that 1.2 million hectares of forests in the Congo Basin achieved certification in 2008. The aspect of the consumption side is taken more clearly into account in the fishing sector, under the Marine Stewardship Council. This is also based on a certification procedure but has a mission to inform and educate (but not exert obligations on) consumers of the product. The life-chain issues for marine fisheries are well summarized by Ecotrust (Scholtz, 2007). The FSC and MSC are practical management initiatives that bind various partners under common objectives and procedures along the value chain. The partners have an opportunity in participating in the governance instrument. This is in contrast with the international Tropical Timber Agreement, an intergovernmental treaty established under UN for encouraging governments in implementing sustainable harvesting practices, but which does not have binding procedures, targets, obligations or monitoring. Individual companies used instruments like audits, product specifications, certification etc and also relied on the governmental regulations like approvals, product standards etc. in a sense the, cooperative LCM which focuses on building strong, formal partnerships is a step to further develop the individual LCM initiatives which is already in place. Its the nature, strength and influence of the partnership coalition which sets it apart from LCM models. These have advantages of not a single government or company being able to exercise leadership. Financial institutions have become a more powerful influence by showing interest in the certification aspects of such LCM exercises as a way of orienting their project funding. The difficulties faced by cooperative process include cost and time consumption in managing. In case of diverse partnership there are often stakeholders who wish to control process in order to reduce the commitment of other partners. The Green Lead Project (2005) suffers from this problem. Reducing the exercise to only a few steps in the life-chain is the most common weakness of life-cycle coalitions (as it is in most LCM exercises), since the joint interests of a diverse group of partners is likely to be concordant only for a limited number of issues. Finally, binding standards never popular with business and compliance me chanisms are essential for a broad coalition to act in a coherent fashion. Here, the weakness of the Tropical Timber Agreement, which has no standards at all, is noteworthy in comparison to the clear procedures of the FSC. Implementation of LCM The diversity of LCM methods above gives a reflection of growing complexity of life chain issues as international trade is expanding. Implementation approach varies with the purpose of the exercise. For product optimization within a single company the parameters of the LCM exercise will be dominated by internal corporate factors like CSR. And conversely, in the case of cooperative LCM, LCM is used for bringing global improvement in chemical safety throughout the entire industry. Also here CSR becomes a subordinate tool in its implementation. LCM will become most effective when business; industry and community work together, each bringing additional value to its implementation. In implementing company initiatives government provides a clear regulatory framework and standards on which business depends upon. Public bodies contribute to the articulation of agreed sustainability targets and to exchange information. This partnership basis to LCM has its strongest expression in the cooperative model. For working towards broader community outcomes on sustainability also the partnership model helps. Business LCM still focuses on achieving narrow corporate outcomes of improved image, marketing, and cost without explicitly and visibly factoring broader global and societal goals into the exercise. Also due to the complexity of the political factors the governments gave reduced ability on their own to make LCM work. The aspirations and objectives of all the social partners can be more easily is taken into account through a multi stake holder LCM. LCM did bring out its effectiveness in many of the circumstances, still many of it depends on the situation; following are the number of factors that stand out: LCM is lik ely to work well where these conditions are met. But there are also problems which can delay LCM implementation. Firstly its the lack of awareness in many sectors that LCM is an appropriate response to their situation. For ex: the UK tanners didnt have the vision to engage with upstream suppliers. Their traditional independence and ingrained perception that downstream government regulations were solely responsible for environmental management led to inaction till it was late. Next being the complexity in dealing with all actors across all sectors of value chain and thereby addressing all issues (as Wal-Mart trying to do). Though influence over immediate suppliers could be done through direct supply chain inclusion of suppliers of the suppliers becomes a big problem needing coordination or surveillance. Its already seen that Gesi initiative excluded metals mining form this program in spite of it being the controversial areas of sustainability agenda. Similarly, Nokia and IKEA e xamples which illustrated current tendency for companies of considering only short sections of the supply chain. Even on the government side it was noted that life-cycle legislation is both complex and politically sensitive due to number of vested interests. But there is no way around this. If a life-cycle approach is required for optimizing sustainability issues for the community rather than a company, it got to be done by learning to deal with extended life-chains and multiple partners. Also finally acknowledgment has to be given for the fact that radical changes in procedure, management resistance are key factors in slow implementation of LCM. As seen before traditional approaches are dying. Corporate managers do not welcome always the higher degree of transparency and sharing of responsibility required. LCM is inevitably an exercise in partnership building. Corporate SCM identifies partners after the issues have already been defined, in case of collaborative approach, the partnership is formed first around a generalized problem. They then develop objectives and goals as a subsequent step. Even integrated government policy and regulation depends on consultation. However, partnership building is more of an inexact science which depends on human insight as much on from formal procedures and the subsequent achievement of unity of purpose along supply chain not being very easy. Thus it can be seen that negotiations on common objectives and procedures take many years. The above factors along with a lack of standardization of LCM technique have led to diverse views of LCM and its functionality and its benefits. Thus along the way the notion of LC assessment gets lost. Also there is confusion about its relationship with environmental management tools. Thus the end result is that LCM is presently standing as an umbrella concept in applying established environmental management tools instead of a rigorous standardized procedure in its own right. Still the res lot to do for promoting and improving of LCM at the level of individual value chains. Eventually the most fundamental issue to be addressed is the optimization of the entire production-consumption system, being the most complex life-cycle management challenge of all. This becomes beyond the capability of the current LCM players in achieving individually given that it requires redesigning simultaneously a wide array of products, services, infrastructure and marketing procedures and the resource base upon which it relies. Thus it will require a much stronger consensus about common sustainability goals. Global production-consumption system building will require sophisticated LCA processes for identifying key factors at play. While PSS will continue to play an important role, such system optimization will become impossible without new tools and instruments making it more important to develop better LC management models that could function at this scale. Synthesis and conclusions Our environment is under higher stress as global economy is continually touching more number of countries. Prevailing environmental approaches are focusing on individual points of production consumption chain, and many pollution abatement actions merely displace problem to another section of value chain. More widespread application of prevention-oriented-life-cycle thinking and emphases on optimizing the system as a whole is required for sustainable development. In order to pinpoint the key areas needing attention is carried out by life-cycle assessment. Efforts by companies, governments and consumer groups have gone into standardizing and promoting its application. LCM is still not a standardized discipline, rather an umbrella framework for applying existing instruments and procedures in a more holistic way and creating management partnerships between upstream and downstream actors. There are different LCM models identified each for a particular situation. The most successful outcome occurs when a broad, multi stakeholder partnership with a formal management framework gets established. Government and business need to make mutually complementary contributions for such coalition and ideally to all LCM initiatives. Until specific tools are developed for LCM, implementation will still depend on current set of environmental management tools which were originally developed for corporate use as for ex: SCM, environmental systems, and green purchasing. Major challenges for the current generation of managers who have grown familiar with a more limited range of applications are application, re orientation, and sometimes redevelopment of these tools in a new LCM framework. As company action on LCM currently been most widespread application, it also depends on government life-cycle policies and the setting of sustainable product standards. Currently most companies are aiming at improving individual products and company image. It doesnt have the mandate to add ress the global situation of unsustainable production and consumption, nor value chains of common commodity products in a global market. Governments are slow in incorporating LCM aspects into their policies and regulations. Their geographical jurisdiction makes it difficult for them to address global value chains. They also face problems in reconciling different political interests along the life-chain of products while attempting to adopt a life-cycle approach to regulation. Thus they are focusing more on information and coordination approaches. That said there remain large, unrealized opportunities as for example, in official procurement and purchasing policies. Even without practice of LCM, consumers are increasingly aware of life-cycle impacts, the so-called world behind the product. They act mainly on a limited product-by-product basis, disseminating information and promoting consumer boycotts. This mechanism has stimulated corporations in reviewing closely the life-chain impacts of their entire range of products as a way of avoiding future adverse publicity or legal liability. A major role is also played by consumer and environmental NGOs in cooperating LCM initiatives by helping in influencing the sustainability objectives. Taken everything together its seen that approaches have given encouraging results in improving management in a number of clearly identified value chains, as much still remains to be done. Overall a growing acceptance by society for a holistic life-cycle approach is necessary in managing global production-consumption system. Other approaches are also being tried put by various stakeholder groups both independently and as CLM partnerships and coalitions. In spite of LCM not being a standardized discipline, it has undisputed value in guiding application of current environmental management tools in arriving at results which cant be achieved through fragmented application like in the past. Further work needs to be done for enh ancing effectiveness of LCM, including its eventual standardization which will add momentum to this encouraging trend. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "What is life cycle management and how it impacts us" essay for you Create order

The Collapse Of The Subprime Mortgage Market Causing A...

The collapse of the subprime mortgage market causing a global financial crisis (GFC) in 2007, has given the concept of securitisation a bad name. Securitisation is the process of conversion of receivables and cash flow generated from a collection or pool of financial assets into the marketable securities. Any asset that generates a cash flow can be securitised, which are then sold to capital market investors. Asset securitisation is the process whereby interests in loans and receivables are packaged and sold in the form of an asset-backed security (ABS). An ABS is the bond or notes backed by some financial assets. These assets consist of receivables such as residential and commercial mortgage loans, automobile loans, and credit card financing. Mortgage-backed securities (MBS) are bonds that are backed by pools of mortgage loans. Examples include mortgage papers, house papers, and land and property papers. Thus in-turn, reflective of the underlying assets in the security are these two terms. Additionally, securitisation is a method of financing assets, to serve as the main source of payment to investors, it usually depends on cash flow generated from principle and interest repayments. Securitisation is one of the most fundamental and complex concepts in the world of finance. The non-existing industry began in the 1970s when home mortgages were pooled by U.S. government-backed agencies. Ten years later, financial institutions and businesses from all different aspects usedShow MoreRelatedThe Global Financial Crisis Of 2007-20081123 Words   |  5 PagesThe Global Financial Crisis of 2007-2008 is the worst financial crisis since the 1930’s The Great Depression (Reuters, 2009). Even if bailouts of banks by national governments prevented the collapse of major financial institutions, worldwide stock markets continued to drop. Evictions and foreclosures overwhelmed the housing market while severed unemployment embraced the labor market (Baily and Elliot, 2009). This global financial crisis was responsible for the decline in the consumers’ wealth, andRead MoreThe Financial Crisis Of Lehmann Brothers1379 Words   |  6 PagesThe 2008 financial crisis, also known as the U.S. Subprime Mortgage crisis, is considered by many economists to be the most perilous crisis faced by the modern day world economy since the 1930s Great Depression (Krugman, 2009). The collapse of Lehmann brothers, one of the world’s leading investment banks before declaring bankruptcy, in September 2008 almost took down the world’s financial system. Many factors such as U.S. Home ownership policies, consequential securitisation, irresponsible lendingRead MoreFinancial Crisis Impact On Institutions And Markets1196 Words   |  5 PagesFinancial Crisis Impact on Institutions and Markets The financial crisis, beginning in 2007, negatively impacted the stability of financial institutions and markets across the world. While there are many speculative causes of the financial crisis, dealings in subprime mortgages are considered the biggest culprit. As a result, those involved in subprime mortgages, such as lenders, investment banks, credit rating agencies and securities investors were among the first to feel the crisis’ ramificationsRead MoreFinancial Crisis And Its Effects On The World Economy1467 Words   |  6 PagesBetween the years of 2007 to 2008, the world was faced with a major financial meltdown with global market failures and economies in shambles. The emergence of subprime mortgages and the collapse of securitized derivatives led to much speculation of different causes. What was the root factor that led to the triggering of this financial crisis? This research conducts a comparative analysis of my research and beliefs on the cause of the crisis con trary to other researchers’ conclusions. It is an aim to provideRead MoreThe Success Of The Great Crash1495 Words   |  6 Pagesuntil the market failure makes its way into the economy in 2008. The period was known as the Great Crash where combination of several failures in the economy contributed to the collapse. The Great Crash Real estate had significantly grown in popularity because as it is considered as a good consumption as well as investment (Malpezzi, 1990). Financial institutions start to offer easy credit to many, including the non-credit worthy ones, mainly the underprivileged. Credit history, financial abilityRead MoreThe Financial Crisis Caused By The Foreclosure Crisis1534 Words   |  7 Pagessteadily rising: most people in every financial class had a credit card, a family to support, and an opportunity to do so by moving into the biggest house they could find. Mortgage loans were given out to anybody with a heartbeat and credit rating, this is called a subprime mortgage. If somebody wanted a new home they could get it, no matter if they could afford it or not. However, when interest rates started to rise people were not able to pay their mortgages and their homes were foreclosed uponRead MoreThe Financial Crisis Of The United States1574 Words   |  7 Pagesdiscuss the financial crisis that occurred in the U.S. in 2008 which precipitated one of the largest catastrophe within the housing market causing a collapse amongst the financial institutions. I will also discuss about how the banks were at fault for giving out loans to individuals who were not capable of affording to pay these loans back and all financial institutions that should have had regulations on the loans that were dispensed as well. Though, the collapse with the financial institutionsRead MoreThe Financial Crisis Of 20081747 Words   |  7 Pageseconomic crisis of 2008 was one for the ages, it changed the world of investing forever. That year, the stock market crashed, bank failures and the infamous wall street bailout that can all be traced back to the subprime mortgage crisis.. The 2008 economic crisis rocked the global economy for the worst, and to this day the United States is trying to recover from the impact that the crisis had. In order to understand why exactly the banks failed people have to understand the subprime mortgage crisisRead MoreExchange Rate Fluctuation Factors On Currency1272 Words   |  6 Pagesof 2007 had a strong impact on foreign currency exchange rates causing a weakening of the USD against foreign currency (USForex, 2015). The economic factors causing the recession resulted in a loss of 8.8 million jobs, a housing market collapse, and ultimately in the weakening of USD value in foreign currency exchange rates. Additionally, political factors such as deregulation and the banking crisis resulting in a lending collapse also contributed to the weakened state of United States (US) currencyRead MoreLehman Brothers Subprime Crisis1939 Words   |  8 PagesIntroduction The global financial crisis that erupted in September 2008 has thrown economies around the world into a recession. The root cause were sown in the credit boom that peaked in mid-2007, followed by the meltdown of sub-prime mortgages and securitized products. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were both taken over by the government and on September 24, 2008, Lehman Brothers declared bankruptcy after failing to find a buyer. The fall of Lehman Brothers rattled the global market and led to a great

Gun Control And The Rights Of A Free State - 1462 Words

â€Å"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed,† many will recognize this as the 2nd second, however, few will know the true purpose for why it was written. The intent of the amendment was to allow the general populace to own personal firearms without restriction, so that, in the case of a government takeover or attack on their well being, they would be able to defend themselves. Regrettably, this has largely been forgotten. A vast majority of the left now believes that the 2nd amendment is just an excuse for conservatives to play with dangerous toys. They look at all of the gun violence and think that the cause is the right to own firearms, so their solution is to either restrict it or repeal it all together. Countries such as Australia, Japan, and England give them their reasoning for strict gun control. Advocates conclude that if America implements the same harsh gun regu lations of these countries, then our gun violence rates will reflect theirs. This is not the case at all, but it makes sense, if it works there, then why wouldn’t it work here? Repealing the 2nd amendment would go directly against the wishes of the founding fathers, and be nearly impossible because the gun community still has great deal of support. Therefore, they have to restrict it; always with the intent of making it so hard for someone to own a gun, that no one will. In light of this, gun rightsShow MoreRelatedGun Control And The Rights Of A Free State1149 Words   |  5 PagesGun Control Multiple news outlets reported the same number over and over. 74. This is the general estimated number of mass school shootings that have occurred since the massacre at Newton’s Sandyhook Elementary School on December 14, 2012. The Newton massacre once again had a nation grieving for loss of innocent lives in such tragic ways and once again the issue of gun control went to the front of the nation’s agenda. American history shows a fascination with gunfighters and the Old West mentalityRead MoreGun Control And The Rights Of A Free State1632 Words   |  7 Pages A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. (The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution). As Americans we are afforded certain rights that are upheld by the United States constitution, and many citizens believe these rights to be part of our nation’s heritage, or the â€Å"birthright† as Americans. Conversely there are those which are opposed to some of these â€Å"birthrights† which were added toRead MoreGun Control And The Rights Of A Free State1195 Words   |  5 PagesCameron Rose Mrs. Rose P.5 Gun Control, Research Paper 25 February 2016 â€Å"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed† (Bill of Rights, 1791). As said by our founding fathers, over two centuries ago, the right to own guns will not be taken away. However recently, there has been a push for a ban on guns, due to the increase in school shootings, homicides, and suicides over the years. Because of thisRead MoreThe Debate Over Gun Control1210 Words   |  5 Pagesnot be involved in gun control. The second amendment to the United state s constitution says A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Is this not enough can the bill of rights say this anymore clear. Many might state that the way this statement is worded is the point of debate and it should be interpreted differently. This is the root of all the hot debate over gun control. Does the constitutionRead MoreGun Control Is Not The Solution982 Words   |  4 PagesFurther Gun Control is not the Solution Lately, as a nation, it seems that we can’t progress more than a month without hearing an incident on national news concerning a shooting. Every shooting that occurs is gaining the national media spotlight. This is prompting leaders and politicians around the country to call for further gun control to answer this current epidemic. Creating new gun laws is not the solution. This only creates extra problems with law-abiding citizens obtaining a firearm and infringingRead MoreGun Control : Argumentative Essay Essay1702 Words   |  7 Pages100 3 November, 2014 Gun Control: Argumentative Essay The gun control debate is a good example that justifies the common known mantra that history will always repeat itself. Gun control is a regulation put forward with an aim of managing the purchase and ownership of firearms with the main aim being to reduce the criminal and unsafe use of firearms. The gun control measures involve strategies such as registration of firearms aimed at restricting the ownership of guns by people proved to beRead MoreDefining New Gun Laws Are Not The Answer996 Words   |  4 Pagesis prompting leaders and politicians around the country to call for further gun control to answer this current epidemic. Creating new gun laws are not the answer. This only creates extra problems with law-abiding citizens obtaining a firearm and infringing on their second amendment right of the United States Constitution, which states: â€Å"a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.† The second amendmentRead MoreThe Problem Of Gun Violence1678 Words   |  7 Pagesthink. The media is trying to push gun control on anyone that will tune in or read it. The media will all say the same thing, and the problem is gun violence. What if one removes the word gun from gun violence, that still leaves violence. Before one can decide which side to support, the information should be completely researched for important, specific information about how America will be affected, and what the cost are for the people protecting their rights. In 1776, Americans feared excessiveRead MoreGun Control Is The Government Regulation Of The Sale And Ownership Of Firearms1660 Words   |  7 Pages3 DC Gun Control Gun control is the â€Å"government regulation of the sale and ownership of firearms.† (Dictionary.com). In D.C., handguns, rifles, shotguns, and revolvers may be registered. Sawed-off shotguns, machine guns, short barreled rifles, unsafe handguns, assault weapons, and .50 caliber rifles are all prohibited in D.C., meaning that there is no possible way to own them. (DC.gov, 2014). A single person may only register one handgun every 30 days unless the gun was owned in another state. CommonlyRead MoreGun Control And The United States889 Words   |  4 PagesGun control is a big thing in the world today. Many Americans want it but also many don’t. There are both good reasoning’s and there are bad reasoning’s. Gun control is for our own safety but can also take our safe feelings away by knowing we won’t have a gun in hand to protect us in a real time of need. The second Amendment is commonly used when trying to set up the restrictions and rules of thes e gun control laws. There are a lot of regulations being set up and still are being made to â€Å"keep us

Resistance to Change Samples for Students †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Resistance to Change. Answer: Resistance to change at a workplace is a normal phenomenon that takes place in every organization. It generally occurs because of bad decision made by the management. In the era of changing external business environment, Resistance to change is an inevitable exercise practiced by the employees. Acceptance of changes in an organization is tough for the employees. One of the most common problems faced by the business is employee resistance to change (Armenakis and Harris, 2009). The resistance to change generally takes place in different ways that constantly affect the organization. It takes in number of ways like an increase in employee turnover, constant argument, resentment, slowdown strikes etc. These changes are affecting the organization on a long run affecting the process of growth. It is tough for the organizations to implement a change. These are important ways for claiming the amount of changes taking place in the business environment. Furthermore, the organizations have a fe ar of meeting the output due to difference in transformation and its management techniques. The organization is failing to meet the expectations of people working in an organization (Arnold, 2015). This is in contrast with the organization and its purpose of getting things done. Resistance to change occurs due to the change. Change is the basic necessity in an organization in order to get things done. It is a usual activity that causes dilemma in attaining the vision of the organization. Due to this, employees tend to adhere to the existing business atmosphere rather than doing unidentified. Some of the employees time after time resist to the progression that can have some negative effect on the organization. All this affect the organizational output amid the employees affecting the bottom line. This bottom line in the organization is affecting the organizational growth. Changes are inevitable in nature. The purpose here is to accept the changes in order to meet the target. Any alte ration in the level of the efficiency directly affects the organizational growth on a long run (Bargal and Schmid, 2012). All These changes have a wide-ranging impact on the employee morale. An employee having a negative attitude to the change is difficult to be managed for a longer time-period. Changes are disorderly to the work environment of an organization. The process of resistance can change the overall process of managing change. Employees spending excess time focusing on resistance pay less focus on daily tasks associated with their jobs. The Changes to an organization is difficult task to gain productive results. The resistance to change create difficulty in balancing the activities (Benn, Dunphy and Griffiths, 2014). When an employee resists change, they may feel less positive and confident about their professional future with the organization. Employees should focus on managing the daily task. However it is important to understand that Change is an anticipated part of bus iness. It is tougher process for some whereas for some it is difficult. This specifically creates problem in implementing change in an organization (Boonstra, 2008). Managing resistance to change is challenging for end number of reasons. There is a necessity to manage the organization in order to gain effectiveness. Employees have realized importance of change management in an organization or want a change and resist publicly, verbally, and argumentatively. Those who are not willing to adopt the changes create a tough situation for the company. This may create a need for confrontation and conflict. Employees feel bumpy with the changes introduced and resist. This is due to their nature to accept the changes as prescribed by Lewin Kurt in the change model. It takes time to adopt the changes in accordance with the needs(Douglas,2011). Power is one of the central forces governing the organisational changes. It has become vital for the business organization to manage the changes. Power is an essential force looking after the basic necessity an individual looking after the changes in an effective way. The leaders in an organization are seen as a driving force to meet the changes(Thomas and Hardy,2011). Organizational group plays an important role in organizing research in a better way. The purpose is to see the organization as a political arrangement. There are certain level of disputes in the organization creating a need to implement an effective change management and development process. Any dispute at the time of introducing change is disruptive for the organization (Cameron and Green, 2015). There is an increase in number of political issues in the centre of the organization. This is important to understand the changes and to implement them in an effective way. The concept of new organization is to implement the changes from the beginning. It is related with redefining the process in order to gain effective results. The only purpose here is to implement the changes without any dispute. The purpose here is to manage the goals alternatively. Power has a direct impact on implementing the changes in an organization (Chao, Lee and Ling, 2012). Change is an important part in an organization irrespective of its size. The entire role here is to manage the growth in congruence with the employee and organizational interest. Changes can be in any form depending upon the organizational needs. It is tougher for the business organization to manage the changes in case excess resistance. These changes directly affect the morale of the employees; it is the duty of the employer to create a sense of security in the mind of the employees. For the reason, the manager has to indulge himself at the time of implementing change. It is the duty of the manager to look after the interest of each and every employee (Ch ao, Lee and Ling, 2012). It is important to notice that the problem arises due to lack of communication in between the employees and the management. This directly affects the morale of the employees and creates issue with both the recruitment and retention process. Thus, in order to gain competencies, it is important to manage the changes on daily basis. All This has a direct impact on the daily efficiency and output of the employees (Goetsch and Davis, 2014). It has a potential to reduce the level of competence unswervingly affecting the organizational growth and management. It is important to find out a way to spend time focusing on factors contributing in resisting the changes taking place in the workplace. In case of introducing a change, the employees become less focused on daily tasks connected with their jobs. It is moreover difficult to coordinate changes due to concentration of power in the hand of few. This creates difficulty in meeting the results in order to gain product ive results. These Changes are difficult for the individual in order to develop effectiveness (Hayes, 2014). Employees not in favour tend to create a negative atmosphere in the employees. There is a continuous unrest among employees. However at times, the change is implemented smoothly without any unrest among employees. The problem only arises when any group in an organization is against the changes. In such a situation, it is difficult to manage the changes in a better way. There are general ways to mitigate the negative effects of resistance. The changes are introduced to foster effective growth and management(Dolan and Bao,2012). By stating the problem in this way, the organization can overcome the dilemma. Change sometimes occurs under the coercion and influence the people. The organization sees a direct impact on the authority and rules in theta influence the employees. The process of Change management is taking place in different shapes bin an organization. The only purpose b ehind incorporating a change is to practice to deal in a challenging situation. The organization is failing to meet the expectations of people working in an organization. This is in contrast with the organization and its purpose of getting things done (Huczynski and Buchanan, 2010). The difficult part in an organization is to introduce change. There is no single way to implement a change in an organization. The most important part in an organization is to gain competency by implementing effective changes. This is only possible by coming up with different change management theories. These theories will help in implementing the changes in the best possible way (Jones, 2010). The change model govern By Kurt Lewin provides with information related with implementation of change in three steps. This allow the managers to coordinate the changes in a well and appropriate way. Power in such a situation is important to be managed in order to organize the situation. Any threat and punishment given to the employees creates unhappiness among the employees (Palmer, Dunford and Akin, 2009). Changes cause ineffectiveness and disrupt the functioning. In this situation, it is important to find out an effective way to resolve the problems occurring due to change. Participation is important for allocating the changes in an effective way. This exercise helps in managing the changes at a regular interval and creates problem at the time of its implementation. The role of power is important to an organization at the time of implementing a change. Power is important to influence people in the organization to adopt the change. It is an important activity to include changes in the functioning (Storey, 2007). Continuous resistance to change is disruptive for the organization. This is because of the problem that occurs due to imbalance in achieving the directed goals. The power is important to an organization in placing things in order to implement changes. These directives are important at the time of introducing changes. The primary focus here is to understand the organizational strength and weakness and implement it thereafter. Some of the employees time after time resist to the progression that can have some negative effect on the organization (Organisational development design explained .2017). Employees generally argue about an implementation of change. The proposed changes to an organization are disruptive. In order to implement changes, it is important to introduce motivational factors. These factors will help in implementing changes on a long run. Leaders have to come up with an effective strategy in order to overcome with the challenges. These are important to manage the changes in an effective way. This is important to manage the changes in the best possible way by introducing a positive technology(Erkama,2010). A leader has a responsi bility to advocate plan to put into practice in order to implement change that will benefit the organizational goals, matter, or a larger group in an ethical way. The Change management occurs at various levels linking both political and ethical considerations. It is however important to include the concern in order to introduce change in a better way. This is possible to remind the need to seek contribution and assure commitment on a regular basis. The leadership is important for an organization (Weiner, 2009.). To conclude, resistance to change requires a balance between constancy and change. It is the basic requirement of the leader to introduce the changes to generate an environment where employees are free to express thoughts. It is evident from the point of view of an organizational growth to develop a transparent process. This helps the employees in achieving the target by incorporating an effective way. The process of change management is crucial for the organization in meeting daily targets. This is important enough to organize the policies in accordance with the changes taking place in the organization. Changes are frequently implemented in a technology based companies. It is due to rapid change in the technology that makes it clear to organize the changes accordingly as per the market requirements. They have to work according to the market pace. This creates difficulty in implementing the changes. However from the point of view of an organizational growth, it is evident to implemen t changes. For the better future, it is important to manage the changes. The change management policies are important to manage the changes through an extra effort.Changes are inevitable in an organization in order to develop an effective organizational environment. Hence, for an organization it is important to manage the changes. References Armenakis, A.A. Harris, S.G., (2009). Reflections: Our journey in organizational change research practice.Journal of Change Management,9(2), pp.127-142. Arnold, P.(2015). The 5 greatest examples of change management in business history. Online. Available at: https://www.managers.org.uk/insights/news/2015/july/the-5-greatest-examples-of-change-management-in-business-history Accessed on: 3 October 2017 Bargal, D. Schmid, H., (2012).Organizational change development in human service organizations.Routledge. Benn, S., Dunphy, D. Griffiths, A., (2014).Organizational change for corporate sustainability.Routledge. Boonstra, J. ed.,( 2008).Dynamics of organizational change learning.John Wiley Sons. Cameron, E. Green, M.,( 2015).Making sense of change management: a complete guide to the models, tools techniques of organizational change.Kogan Page Publishers. Chao,C., Lee,A. Ling,G(.2012). Understanding OD Its Role: A Think Piece on OrganisationDevelopment. Online Available at: https://www.cscollege.gov.sg/Knowledge/Pages/Understanding-OD-and-Its-Role-A-Think-Piece-on-Organisation-Development.aspx Accessed on: 3 October 2017 Cummings, T.G. Worley, C.G., (2014).Organization development change.Cengage learning. Dolan, S.L. and Bao, Y., (2012). Sharing the Culture: Embedding Storytelling and Ethics in the Culture Change Management Process.Journal of Management Change,29(1). Douglas, F., (2011). Between a rock and a hard place: career guidance practitioner resistance and the construction of professional identity.International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance,11(3), pp.163-173. Erkama, N., (2010). Power and resistance in a multinational organization: Discursive struggles over organizational restructuring.Scandinavian Journal of Management,26(2), pp.151-165. Goetsch, D.L. Davis, S.B., (2014).Quality management for organizational excellence. Upper Saddle River, NJ: pearson. Hayes, J., (2014).The theory practice of change management. Palgrave Macmillan. Huczynski, A. Buchanan, D.A., (2010).Organizational behaviour. Financial Times Prentice Hall. Jones, G.R., (2010). Organizational theory, design, change. Organisational development design explained .(2017).Online. Available at: https://www.southampton.ac.uk/hr/services/od-explained/index.page Accessed on: 3 October 2017 Rothwell, W.J., Stavros, J.M., Sullivan, R.L. Sullivan, A. eds., (2009).Practicing organization development: A guide for leading change(Vol. 34).John Wiley Sons. Storey, J., (2007).Human resource management: A critical text. Cengage Learning EMEA. Thomas, R. and Hardy, C., (2011). Reframing resistance to organizational change.Scandinavian Journal of Management,27(3), pp.322-331. Weiner, B.J., (2009). A theory of organizational readiness for change.Implementation science,4(1), p.67.

Sustainability Essay Example For Students

Sustainability Essay Modern days have a specific requirement of multi-sided development of a person who’s to be well aware of the conflicts and misfortunes which humanity is encountering. No wonder high school and college curriculums have included the subject of sustainability as a part of their global citizenship programs. Mostly, when it comes to sustainability people have an image of proper natural resources management and the proper use of fossils. Notwithstanding, sustainability has a deeper implication that includes not only natural resources but also environmental and social management. Therefore, the subject requires a deep look into the established problems and suggested solutions. Here, we offer four 200-word essays on environmental sustainability, its matter, obstacles, and probably resolutions. Outline1 Sustainability Essay Example 1 (242 words)2 Sustainability Essay Example 2 (233 words)3 Sustainability Essay Example 3 (233 words)4 Sustainability Essay Sample 4 (238 words) Sustainability Essay Example 1 (242 words) We will write a custom essay on Sustainability specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now They say that the planet Earth has been undergoing significant changes due to its millennial cycles of natural and environmental deviations. I believe that such changes are a matter of human concern because of human interference with the natural balance, i.e., extraction of fossils, green gas emissions, contamination of waters, cutting-out of rainforests, etc. As a ground, I would like to state my reasons. First of all, the age of industrial breakthrough has led to the development and implementation of technological innovations, which have brought the facilitation of human labor and a tremendous price to pay. As a consequence, the use of machinery has caused the over-extraction of fossils and overproduction of fossil derivatives due to the human inability to designate limits and predict possible outcomes. Second of all, again, the use of machines that simplify human labor has brought us to a point when the level of chemicals emissions is exceeding the amount of such that our environment can process. Third of all, as a consequence of the previous two, green gases are not worked up by nature and deposit in the atmosphere. This causes sun radiation accumulation and global warming and leads to glaciers melting. As a conclusion, I would like to underscore the urgency of the implementation of sustainability means that can, at least, decelerate the decay and disturbance of natural balance. Without it, humanity might never get well after the mistakes of its previous generations. Sustainability Essay Example 2 (233 words) Sustainability is a contemporary word frequently used by mass media that has raised a clamor around the issues of water contamination, forest cutting-out and the devastation of habitats. Apart from being associated with ecological problems sustainability implies a more thorough context. So, what does it means and what should people understand when hearing this term? For starters, sustainability is a study of principles and norms elaborated to manage natural resources properly, so that they are preserved intact for future generations. Also, it means a practice of planning and elaboration of approaches and strategies that are aimed at sustaining an environment, coping with its challenges and adjusting society to the most efficient ways of human-nature interaction. If we take into consideration the dimension of natural resources management, then the subject is based on three main principles. The first one deals with the use of solar energy and finding a means of replacing old energy sources with new ones based on alternative kinds of energy. The second principle refers to biodiversity which unfolds approaches implemented to preserve and sustain the arts of biological organisms and their natural habitats. The third one regards cycling of chemicals in the atmosphere and their management, i.e., the reduction of abundance and increase of their lack. All in all, sustainability is a complex topic whose goal is to raise awareness about the ecological and social issue of the modern time. .ud11e057fc61cf63803b1117c99c6a73e , .ud11e057fc61cf63803b1117c99c6a73e .postImageUrl , .ud11e057fc61cf63803b1117c99c6a73e .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ud11e057fc61cf63803b1117c99c6a73e , .ud11e057fc61cf63803b1117c99c6a73e:hover , .ud11e057fc61cf63803b1117c99c6a73e:visited , .ud11e057fc61cf63803b1117c99c6a73e:active { border:0!important; } .ud11e057fc61cf63803b1117c99c6a73e .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ud11e057fc61cf63803b1117c99c6a73e { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ud11e057fc61cf63803b1117c99c6a73e:active , .ud11e057fc61cf63803b1117c99c6a73e:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ud11e057fc61cf63803b1117c99c6a73e .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ud11e057fc61cf63803b1117c99c6a73e .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ud11e057fc61cf63803b1117c99c6a73e .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ud11e057fc61cf63803b1117c99c6a73e .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ud11e057fc61cf63803b1117c99c6a73e:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ud11e057fc61cf63803b1117c99c6a73e .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ud11e057fc61cf63803b1117c99c6a73e .ud11e057fc61cf63803b1117c99c6a73e-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ud11e057fc61cf63803b1117c99c6a73e:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Historic Preservation: Gentrification or Economic Development EssaySustainability Essay Example 3 (233 words) An environment is, as they say, a cradle of our civilization that has been nurturing humanity since its dawn. People have a moral obligation to put maximal efforts into paying it back by reasonably and sufficiently handling its resources. For this, our society has been struggling with implementing the laws of sustainability. Sustainability as a way of managing nature wisely deals with a variety of aspects, which are focused on anthropological implications since here the interaction of a human being and their environment is in the center of attention. The matter includes a few dimensions which create its core. The social aspect involves issues which directly influence the well-being of a group of people, the group’s response to certain natural forces and possible changes, which can be caused by such. The economic aspect is a business perspective on how to use nature as an accelerator of economic processes, on how to outline a business the way it won’t harm its environment. The environmental aspect is, certainly, the most known and discussed topic. It’s a reflection of a society’s intention on how to interact with, use and apply natural resources with a purpose of improving such a society’s well-being. To sum up, it’s needed to be mentioned that sustainability involves more than just the management of an environment. It’s a diverse and promising vector of adjusting human life to the demands of the modern age. Sustainability Essay Sample 4 (238 words) Every century establishes certain requirements for a person, which have a purpose of facilitating the process of the person’s adjustment to their environment. As of today, a human being is asked of leading a sustainable way of life, which implies that one has to be reasonable and consistent in their lifestyle regarding water use, cleanliness of surroundings, chemicals use, and emissions. So, what are the main traits of a sustainable person? First of all, such a person has a high awareness of their environment’s issues and is ready to make decisions aimed at such issues’ resolution and prevention from happening ever again. Apart from this, it involves social and private motivation to implement changes. Second of all, a sustainable person takes actions and applies them to their own life. This regards an everyday routine, e.g., wise use of water, saving of electro-energy (or switching to alternative energy sources), etc. Third of all, to make any action widespread and in this case sustainable attitude a social phenomenon, it has to be followed and ‘worshiped’ by a formidable number of people. For this reason, it requires informing others about the reason and value of living a sustainable life by those who already lead such a life. Lastly, sustainability should not be regarded as an invention of our technological era. Its purpose is to learn how to live with nature in peace and preserve its gifts for our children.